For those who didn't follow the WG discussion, here is a quick test case showing OWL DL annotations as non-monotonic <owl:Thing rdf:about="eg:a"> <my:prop>foo</my:prop> </owl:Thing> DL-entails <owl:Thing rdf:about="eg:a"> <my:prop>bar</my:prop> </owl:Thing> ========= Because, my:prop has no property declaration, and is hence treated as an annotation, which is given no semantics in OWL DL. ========= Adding the same information to both files breaks the entailment. viz: <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="&my;prop"/> <owl:Thing rdf:about="eg:a"> <my:prop>foo</my:prop> </owl:Thing> does not entail <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="&my;prop"/> <owl:Thing rdf:about="eg:a"> <my:prop>bar</my:prop> </owl:Thing> ==== because this time my:prop is treated as semantically meaningful. JeremyReceived on Thursday, 30 January 2003 13:52:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT