- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 04 Nov 2002 14:03:17 -0600
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- Cc: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:54, Jeff Heflin wrote: > > I could live with this, but would be much happier if we also had a > generic sameAs property that could be used in place of the three longer > named properties. Note that this specification gives the generic meaning, in large owl. I prefer to call it sameAs too. I was going to suggest that, since the domain/range isn't really constrained to Individuals... but in fast OWL, it is so constrained. But now that somebody else has spoken up, I concur. > I know this has come up before. Note, if someone used > sameAs between a property and a class in OWL/DL, this would be no > different than if they declared the same ID to be of both type Class and > Property. Good point. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 15:02:51 UTC