W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:01:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20021218.080146.26495265.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

That is currently missing.  

I will add a production like

Ontology(<directive> ...)	#  rdf:type owl:Ontology .

peter

PS: By the way, how DO you refer to the current URI in an N-triple?



From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:06:26 +0100

> 
> 
> Peter,
> 
> can you point me at text that explains how the metadata stuff (including
> 
> <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""/>
> 
> ) is included in the abstract syntax.
> 
> I want to check that I am right in thinking that the following two files are
> in OWL Lite:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B.rdf
> 
> hmmm,
> 
> they are not are they?
> 
> They don't say that the classes are subclasses of owl:Thing and hence they
> cannot be the image of the mapping rules.

Right.

> Jeremy

peter
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 08:01:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT