W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: owl:Ontology in abstract syntax

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Dec 2002 13:55:35 -0600
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: jjc@hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1040241335.14858.55.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 07:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> That is currently missing.  
> 
> I will add a production like
> 
> Ontology(<directive> ...)	#  rdf:type owl:Ontology .
> 
> peter
> 
> PS: By the way, how DO you refer to the current URI in an N-triple?

You don't.

N-triples only allows absolute URI references.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-testcases-20021112/#uriref

In N3, the same-document URI reference is written <>.


[[[
I could try to give the title of an N3 document by


<> <#title>  "A simple example of N3".
]]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:55:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT