W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2001

Re: NAME: SWOL versus WOL

From: Leo Obrst <lobrst@mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:44:09 -0500
Message-ID: <3C2BA439.FCEDDEE7@mitre.org>
To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
CC: WOL <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Best I've heard so far. And OWLs are big this year, can deliver mail, at
least.

Frank van Harmelen wrote:
> 
> Ziv Hellman wrote:
> >
> > OWL is excellent.
> >
> > One man's opinion: Let's go for that.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Ziv
> 
> It would certainly have my backing too,
> for all the reasons outlined in Tim's message.
> 
> Frank.
>    ----

-- 
_____________________________________________
Dr. Leo Obrst		The MITRE Corporation
mailto:lobrst@mitre.org Intelligent Information Management/Exploitation
Voice: 703-883-6770	7515 Colshire Drive, M/S W640
Fax: 703-883-1379       McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2001 17:44:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:46 GMT