W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2001

RE: NAME: SWOL versus WOL

From: Frederik Brysse <Frederik.Brysse@ivisgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:36:13 -0000
Message-ID: <F5A180EF38FFD311942C00B0D021937B35CFF6@ivisserver1.ivisgroup.com>
To: "WOL" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I'm not too keen on OWL, although the reasons below are great reasons,
the name OWL has too many meanings, making it quite hard to find "our
OWL" on the web using search engines. 
(owl returns over 900K hit on google, and even "OWL semantic web"
already returns 923 hits).  
I would like a name that is more useful in a search engine context. 
WOW-G is quite good for this, SWOL also helps a bit. 

What about WOML: Web Ontoloy Modelling Language. (or Markup Language if
you want yet another -ML).  Search engines return few hits (none when
using "WOML semantic" or "WOML ontology"), and it's not too painful to
pronounce. Also, all TLD's except .com are still available for it.


F.

-----Original Message-----
From: tim finin [mailto:finin@cs.umbc.edu]
Sent: 27 December 2001 15:33
To: WOL
Subject: Re: NAME: SWOL versus WOL

[snip]

I prefer the three letter WOL to the longer SWOL.  How about OWL
as a variation.  The words would be the same (Ontology Web Language)
but it has several advantages: (1) it has just one obvious pronunciation
which is easy on the ear; (2) it opens up great opportunities for logos;
(3) owls are associated with wisdom; (4) it has an interesting back
story.
OWL has probably been used for many computer languages and projects (see
below), but I don't think that is a show stopper.  

[snip]


**********************************************************************

Copyright. 

Ivis Group - Mission Critical  XML

Ivis Group Ltd., CP House, 97 107 Uxbridge Road, London  W5 5TL. Tel: +44 (0)20 8579-3335

This message (including any attachments) is intended for the person(s) or organisation(s) 
named above.  It is confidential and may be legally privileged or protected by law.  
Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any part is strictly prohibited.  If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your 
system.

Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other 
defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free.  No responsibility is 
accepted by Ivis Group Ltd. for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use.

No message or attachment is to be legally binding upon Ivis Group unless evidenced by the 
written authority of two duly authorised representatives.

The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of 
Ivis Group Ltd. or any of its subsidiaries.

www.ivisgroup.com
**********************************************************************
Received on Friday, 28 December 2001 05:41:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:46 GMT