W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2001

Re: proposal for working on the ontology language (N3 scary)

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:47:37 -0600
Message-Id: <p05101004b83c2f2e285e@[]>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
>"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
>>  > On syntax I note that Jim suggested actively using N3. If we wish to do
>>  > this, we may wish to standardize N3 at the same time, since the current
>>  > specs are rather loose working documents from TBL and DanC. This could be
>>  > done similarly to how RDF Core have created n-triple.
>>  Frankly N3 scares me.  It has this mystique, but there are many differing
>>  specifications of exactly what it is, and there are no semantics at all for
>>  some of its constructs.  I suggest not touching N3 with an eleven-foot pole.
>N3 scares me too. ;-)
>I sure like it as short-hand; it's really hard to
>write XML correctly in email and IRC.
>But Peter's right that there's no real specification of N3
>in traditional logical terms.

OK, maybe what we need is N2.5. Think about it.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 16:47:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:40 UTC