Tim Finin wrote: > > "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > > I am concerned that the group is not working on the ontology language > > itself. There are a number of changes that need to be done to DAML+OIL, > > largely because of changes that have happened since DAML+OIL was designed. > > ... > > Are adding capabilities to the language, such as the ability > to express rules, on our radar screen? Some of the use cases > that I am interested (e.g., representing security policies) > will eventually require encoding some rules. I agree with your statement that they are needed, but rules are out of our remit, as per our charter (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/charter.html, section 1.3) Frank. ----Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 16:19:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:46 GMT