Re: proposal for working on the ontology language

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
>  I am concerned that the group is not working on the ontology language
>  itself.  There are a number of changes that need to be done to DAML+OIL,
>  largely because of changes that have happened since DAML+OIL was designed.
>  ...

Are adding capabilities to the language, such as the ability
to express rules, on our radar screen?  Some of the use cases
that I am interested (e.g., representing security policies)
will eventually require encoding some rules.