* Matt Oshry wrote: >The VBWG does not consider the file extension to be significant enough >to warrant changing the VoiceXML 2.1 specification at this stage in its >lifecycle. Please cite technical rationale for this decision, I don't see how the maturity of the document may be in any way relevant to the issue. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 12:38:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 October 2006 12:49:02 GMT