RE: [R111-12] VoiceXML 2.1: DOM 2 reference

Bjoern,

The Voice Browser Working Group, in consultation with an editor of the DOM L2 and DOM L3 specifications, has concluded that DOM L2, a full W3C Recommendation, sufficiently and completely describes the functionality necessary for the purposes of VoiceXML 2.1.  If you feel that there are technical differences between DOM L2 and DOM L3 that require the VBWG to choose DOM L3 instead of DOM L2 for VoiceXML 2.1, please provide the working group with the specifics by December 22, 2005. 

If you do not think you can respond before 22 December, please let me know. The Director will appreciate a response as to whether or not you agree with the resolution. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 22 December 2005, we will assume that you accept our resolution.

Matt Oshry
-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 2:34 AM
To: Matt Oshry
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: Re: VoiceXML 2.1: DOM 2 reference

* Matt Oshry wrote:
>DOM Level 2 core reflects the W3C recommendation that was most widely 
>implemented in the industry by platform vendors at the time the feature 
>set for VoiceXML 2.1 was agreed upon by the VBWG. DOM Level 3 builds on 
>DOM Level 2 but specifies a set of functionality for which there was 
>not broad enough implementation experience to justify referencing it 
>while still meeting all the requirements laid out in [2].

Well, I did not ask to add functionality but to reference to more recent specification of the same feature set. Are there technical differences between DOM2 and DOM3 that hinder making reference to DOM3?
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 01:13:12 UTC