W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2005

VBWG Last Call Issue: <?access-control?> PI

From: MattO <matto@tellme.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:13:59 -0800
To: <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004301c534c5$c11fb710$6401a8c0@sea.tellme.com>

Dear Dan,

In response to your request [1], the VBWG requested feedback from the XML
Core Working Group [2] on the use of a Processing Instruction in the
VoiceXML 2.1 specification. The XML Core WG concluded there is "no strong
technical argument against using a PI in this case" [3]. This conclusion was
reiterated in [4].

We hope this addresses your concerns. If you are not satisfied with the XML
Core WG's response or the Voice Browser Working Group's decision to leave
the Processing Instruction as-is in Appendix E of VoiceXML 2.1, let us know
if would like us to register your formal objection in the VoiceXML 2.1
Disposition of Comments as we present the VoiceXML 2.1 specification for
consideration as a Candidate Recommendation.

Matt Oshry

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005JanMar/0075.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005JanMar/0074.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005JanMar/0078.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2005JanMar/0080.html
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2005 01:14:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:38 UTC