W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: VoiceXML for Voice out only.

From: Andrew Hunt <andrew.hunt@speechworks.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:54:41 +0100
To: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>, <www-voice@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NEBBIPBPMMJJJOKAKJHNOEIHCJAA.andrew.hunt@speechworks.com>

SSML has the <audio> element that permits the intermixing
of TTS and pre-recorded audio.  See Section 2.10 in the 
current draft specification.  


> Should it? I.e. no user speech input.

I'm not sure what this means.  If the question is whether
SSML supports speech input (i.e. speech recognition) then
that is handled by the separate grammar specification as
well as by VoiceXML.  If the question is different I'll be
happy to answer it.

  Andrew Hunt
  Co-editor SSML

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of DPawson@rnib.org.uk
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:08 PM
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: VoiceXML for Voice out only.
> One use case we have where SSML is inadequate,
> and VoiceXML fills the bill, is the inter-mixing
> of text-to-speech and pre-recorded pieces of text
> in .wav files.
> So far I've not managed to persuade IBM's SDK
> to run in this mode.
> Should it? I.e. no user speech input.
> TIA, DaveP
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 18:58:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:34 UTC