W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Missing attribute in a <script> element (Was: Re: [VE][127] Add Subject Here)

From: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:47:36 +0200
To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Message-Id: <3EA77B5D-927B-438F-BB10-3D96FEEACBE8@gmx.de>
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>

Am 13.06.2008 um 16:28 schrieb Jukka K. Korpela:

> David Dorward wrote:
>> The ONLY practical difference between type="application/javascript"
>> and type="text/javascript", which is what started this off, is that  
>> IE
>> will ignore script elements using the former.
> I think the debate over this choice should end, or should already have
> ended, on this list. There are other forums for such discussions,  
> and as
> regards to validation, there is absolutely no difference between them
> (or between them and type="hello world!").
> The choice is relevant, of course, but the options and their basic
> characteristics have been described now, and anything beyond that is
> surely off-topic here

OK. I comply to you. We really got OT. I, for my part of it, will shut  
up now.

Sierk Bornemann
email:            sierkb@gmx.de
WWW:              http://sierkbornemann.de/
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 14:48:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:56 UTC