W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2007

Re: The bi-validator, our latest baby :)

From: Karim A. <directeur@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:31:44 +0100
Message-ID: <9ddf33ea0711081331j7d6bd21bm8176d99dd20bdccf@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org

Thanks Frank for the feedback

I actually interpret the soap responses
of both the W3C markup and css validators.

Don't know why the css validator acts this
way for your redirection, but it gives the same
answer as the one xhtml-css.com gives you:

I actually have a strangest problem with the
css part of xhtml-css.com the W3C gives
an internal fault which doesn't explain anything
about the css itself. Look:


Anyone, btw, with an explanation for this please help!! :)


Innovate Humanum Es

On 11/8/07, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
> Karim A. wrote:
> > Any comments or suggestions are very welcome!
> I tested one of my "validator torture" URLs:
> <http://purl.net/xyzzy/ibm850.htm>.  It passes
> the XHTML check, but somewhere in the CSS test
> you drop the ball.
> The W3C CSS validator also hates redirections,
> interestingly the W3C validator constructs a
> working CSS validation link without redirection
> on the fly.
>  Frank
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 21:31:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:54 UTC