W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2007

Re: The bi-validator, our latest baby :)

From: Karim A. <directeur@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:31:44 +0100
Message-ID: <9ddf33ea0711081331j7d6bd21bm8176d99dd20bdccf@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org

Thanks Frank for the feedback

I actually interpret the soap responses
of both the W3C markup and css validators.

Don't know why the css validator acts this
way for your redirection, but it gives the same
answer as the one xhtml-css.com gives you:

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.net%2Fxyzzy%2Fibm850.htm&warning=1&profile=css21&usermedium=all
I actually have a strangest problem with the
css part of xhtml-css.com the W3C gives
an internal fault which doesn't explain anything
about the css itself. Look:

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fxhtml-css.com%2Fstatic%2Fxui.css&warning=1&profile=css21&usermedium=all

Anyone, btw, with an explanation for this please help!! :)

Thanks


Karim
--
http://akoncept.com
Innovate Humanum Es


On 11/8/07, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
>
> Karim A. wrote:
>
> > Any comments or suggestions are very welcome!
>
> I tested one of my "validator torture" URLs:
> <http://purl.net/xyzzy/ibm850.htm>.  It passes
> the XHTML check, but somewhere in the CSS test
> you drop the ball.
>
> The W3C CSS validator also hates redirections,
> interestingly the W3C validator constructs a
> working CSS validation link without redirection
> on the fly.
>
>
>  Frank
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 21:31:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT