- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:34:08 +0100
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
On Feb 7, 2007, at 17:17 , Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > > I like the idea (but not the idea of shewing "tidied" > code unless specifically requested) Absolutely. This will be an option, and I think I'd rather have it off by default, if only to save server resources. > , but -- not being > familiar with "libtidy" -- would be concerned if it > didn't have an option (ideally set as default) to > emulate the "style" of the page it was attempting > to tidy. For example, if the user consistently > used upper-case tags and lower-case classnames, > it would be nice if the tidier did likewise. I suspect > this may well be beyond its abilities, but I still > think it would be a valuable feature ... My - limited - experience with tidy is that it has and applies its own markup coding style, making it a tool NOT for people who care greatly about what their code looks like, but these would probably be hostile to the idea of letting a tool clean up their code automatically in the first place. -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:34:16 UTC