W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2007

Re: QA & A11y question: new w3c validator interface

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:19:10 +0100
Message-ID: <46CDCF9E.1000003@splintered.co.uk>
To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
CC: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org, www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>

olivier Thereaux wrote:

> For the options toggling, we are using the mootools framework's slideOut 
> and slideIn routines, I can send them a suggestion to make sure that 
> slideOut() properly forces display:none;.

I'm a relative novice to mootools myself, but from what I can see in the 
documentation, slideIn/slideOut accept all Fx.Base options.

http://docs.mootools.net/Effects/Fx-Base.js#Fx.Base

As part of those, you can set functions for onStart and onComplete. I'd 
say that these could be used to basically keep the current effect, but 
toggle another function that flips the display from none to block as 
part of the onStart of slideOut, and switches display back to none for 
the slideIn...

Hope that made some kind of sense...

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:19:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:25 GMT