- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:10:27 +0100
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- CC: wai-xtech@w3.org, www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
> olivier Thereaux wrote: > >> For the options toggling, we are using the mootools framework's >> slideOut and slideIn routines, I can send them a suggestion to make >> sure that slideOut() properly forces display:none;. I've had a little play with a very simplified version of the slideOut issue. http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/archives/mootools_slidein/ The javascript may provide something that can be trickled back into w3c-validator.js P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 00:10:36 UTC