W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Validator complains because it cannot determine validation mode from document type

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:52:39 -0500
Message-ID: <46157DB7.7090008@aptest.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
CC: www-validator@w3.org

Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> huh? That would be content sniffing and against Web architecture.
> The mime type has priority and for good reasons.
A media type in a header does indeed take priority... I know this, of 
course.  My point was that, as we all know, lots of XHTML 1 documents 
get served as text/html when in fact they are really well-formed, valid XML.
>
> Imagine you want to serve the source code of this document sending it 
> then as text/plain.  With the above reasoning, it would mean that we 
> do not respect the intent of the author.
>
> If you send it as text/html, it is HTML
> If you send it as application/xhtml+xml it is xml
If you send it as text/html, it *might* be XHTML.  Since we tell people 
they can do that.  So, since we tell them that, we should at least 
provide some way to help them validate things that they serve up as 
that.  Maybe we do this already and I don't know where the control is.


-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 22:52:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:24 GMT