ISO-8859-3

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

> Whether iso-8859-3 is really _needed_ is debatable. It might be better not
> to support it, thereby encourageing authors to move to other encodings.

ISO-8859-3 used to be popular with esperantists. Don't know if
it still is.

Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 16:24:09 UTC