W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 2002

w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!)

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 25 Oct 2002 14:17:15 +0200
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1035548237.7000.33.camel@stratustier>
Le ven 25/10/2002 ŗ 13:07, Jim Ley a ťcrit :
> Yes, most of them aren't Appendix C either for other more serious
> reasons, even if they do validate (which to be honest most of w3.org
> doesn't).

Err, where did you get that most of w3.org doesn't validate? It's quite
the contrary: using an approach like in [1], I can actually affirm that
at least 45% of our traffic is for valid web pages [this is only a
lowest bound: 20 invalid documents among our 476 top visited pages].

BTW, any non valid pages (be it DTD-valid or MIME-type valid [e.g.
appendix C of xhtml1] is considered to be a bug on our web site and
should be reported to the Webmaster [2].

Dom

1. http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/09/Step-by-step
2. http://www.w3.org/Help/Webmaster
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/INRIA
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 08:17:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:04 GMT