"Dominique Hazaël-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote in message news:1035548237.7000.33.camel@stratustier... >> Yes, most of them aren't Appendix C either for other more serious >> reasons, even if they do validate (which to be honest most of w3.org >> doesn't). >Err, where did you get that most of w3.org doesn't validate? It's quite >the contrary: using an approach like in [1], I can actually affirm that >at least 45% of our traffic is for valid web pages [this is only a >lowest bound: 20 invalid documents among our 476 top visited pages]. Yes, things are getting much better in the top visited pages, there's still all of the /TR/ archive and won't ever validate. Jim.Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 08:51:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:04 GMT