W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 2002

Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!)

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:48:47 -0000
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <apbell$pfo$1@main.gmane.org>

"Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote in message

>> Yes, most of them aren't Appendix C either for other more serious
>> reasons, even if they do validate (which to be honest most of w3.org
>> doesn't).

>Err, where did you get that most of w3.org doesn't validate? It's quite
>the contrary: using an approach like in [1], I can actually affirm that
>at least 45% of our traffic is for valid web pages [this is only a
>lowest bound: 20 invalid documents among our 476 top visited pages].

Yes, things are getting much better in the top visited pages, there's
still all of the /TR/ archive and won't ever validate.

Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 08:51:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:34 UTC