W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Beta: Charset attribute

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 17:57:05 +0100
To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <a01060005-1021-4871D138EF4D11D6B10300039300CF5C@[]>

Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote:

>On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:03, Terje Bless wrote:
>>>Anyway, I found the "Note: The HTTP Content-Type field did not contain
>>>a "charset" attribute ..." confusing in the context. Could it be
>>>worded differently?
>>Probably. Can you suggest something that would have made more sense to
>Here's mine (note the s/field/header/ too):
>For the upload case:
>"Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by your user agent
>[maybe-the-User-Agent-header-here] did not contain ..."
>For the "normal" case:
>"Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by the server
>[maybe-the-Server-header-here] did not contain ..."

Mostly this was allready changed due to feedback from Chris Lilley, but
I've tweaked it further to bring it in line with your suggestion.

"Temper Temper! Mr. Dre? Mr. NWA? Mr. AK, comin´
 straight outta Compton and y'all better make way?"            -- eminem
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2002 11:57:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:35 UTC