On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:03, Terje Bless wrote: > >Anyway, I found the "Note: The HTTP Content-Type field did not contain a > >"charset" attribute ..." confusing in the context. Could it be worded > >differently? > > Probably. Can you suggest something that would have made more sense to you? Here's mine (note the s/field/header/ too): For the upload case: "Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by your user agent [maybe-the-User-Agent-header-here] did not contain ..." For the "normal" case: "Note: The HTTP Content-Type header sent by the server [maybe-the-Server-header-here] did not contain ..." -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fiReceived on Saturday, 2 November 2002 13:12:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:06 GMT