* Terje Bless wrote: >Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > >[ "http://www.bjoernsworld.de/cgi-bin/dtd.pl?björn" vs. ] >[ "http://www.bjoernsworld.de/cgi-bin/dtd.pl?bj%c3%b6rn" ] > >>As per XML 1.0 Second Edition section 4.2.2 XML processors must process >>these documents as beeing equivalent, the Validator however does not, it >>claims the second document beeing valid while the first document is said >>to be invalid. It's getting somehow confused by the system identifier in >>the first example. >Thanks for digging this up (how ever did you think to try that?)! :-) Most XML processors get it wrong and considering the many caveats of SP regarding it's XML support, it was rather unlikely it'll get it right.Received on Sunday, 3 November 2002 12:47:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:06 GMT