W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Strict Not so strict.

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:03:53 -0400
Message-Id: <p05111744b912de93355f@[24.201.26.36]>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
At 18:42 +0100 2002-05-23, Nick Kew wrote:
>They are errors if applied to an element where they are not allowed.
>
>If you want stricter validation, strip the DTD down a bit, or use
>another DTD.

You can use XHTML 1.1 [1] which is a little bit stricter.
But you will still have presentational (table [2]) things... XHTML 
2.0 is not far away

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/changes.html#a_changes
[2] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410/abstract_modules.html#sec_5.6.


-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 14:03:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:03 GMT