scripsit Karl Dubost: > At 18:42 +0100 2002-05-23, Nick Kew wrote: > >They are errors if applied to an element where they are not allowed. > > > >If you want stricter validation, strip the DTD down a bit, or use > >another DTD. > > You can use XHTML 1.1 [1] which is a little bit stricter. > But you will still have presentational (table [2]) things... XHTML > 2.0 is not far away Be aware, though, that if you need to support legacy browsers XHTML 1.1 will pose problems, because it has eliminated the `name' attribute on <a> elements. NS4 cannot hit `id' targets, so links to such anchors will break. -- Thanasis Kinias Web Developer, Information Technology Graduate Student, Department of History Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A. Ash nazg durbatulūk, ash nazg gimbatul, Ash nazg thrakatulūk agh burzum-ishi krimpatulReceived on Thursday, 23 May 2002 14:20:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:03 GMT