On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Tobias Reif wrote: > this test case > > http://www.pinkjuice.com/temp/w3_validator/adjattrs.xhtml > I would prefer if the W3C validator interface would offer a choice of > various up-to-date validators, eg libxml's xmllint etc. The existing service is based on OpenSP, which has known limitations in its XML support. A native XML validator based on Xerces is in the pipeline. Running it on your testpage generates a summary "not well-formed XML" and a single error where you'd expect it. -- Nick KewReceived on Monday, 9 December 2002 13:30:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:07 GMT