Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed

Nick Kew wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Tobias Reif wrote:
> 
>>this test case
>>
>>   http://www.pinkjuice.com/temp/w3_validator/adjattrs.xhtml
>>
> 
>>I would prefer if the W3C validator interface would offer a choice of 
>>various up-to-date validators, eg libxml's xmllint etc.
>>
> The existing service is based on OpenSP, which has known limitations
> in its XML support.
> 
> A native XML validator based on Xerces is in the pipeline.


Great!

I still would like to see additional choices, eg xmllib's xmllint.


> Running it on your testpage generates a summary "not well-formed XML"
> and a single error where you'd expect it.


OK.
(In my report, I listed Xerces' error report.)

Tobi


-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/