- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:14:04 +0200
- To: Max Bell <mbell@pobox.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
* Max Bell wrote:
>I realize this is a heretical idea :-), but I think it would be
>nice to have a 'html 2.0 transitional' syntax option. I author
>my pages to 2.0 but allow 3.2 attributes. This approach yields
>pages which have improved appearance over strict 2.0 ('<body
>bgcolor="white">' versus strict's '<body>') without breaking the
>parsing of Lynx or the legacy browsers I have tested. a '2.0
>transitional' option would allow me to check my pages against the
>validator without the excessive noise due to the strictly illegal
>attributes to body, img, etc.
Why don't you just use HTML 3.2 or better HTML 4.01 Transitional?
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 18:12:46 UTC