W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2001

Re: charset parameter

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 05:07:01 +0200
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Cc: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9qa4mtgooea2bsqer444273lqgc8pjhp4n@4ax.com>
* Martin Duerst wrote:
>>No, the intent was, that _servers_ parse the HTML document and send the
>>correct Content-Type: header, HTML 4 even says so.
>
>Where?

E.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#adef-http-equiv
obviously.

>Is that a must?

For whom? An HTTP server implementing HTML?

>>[1] I think the http-equiv attribute is the worst thing ever
>>     incorporated into HTML. It hasn't been implemented, it beeing
>>     abused, semantics aren't clearly defined, the definition is
>>     ambigious, only a small number of people put syntactically valid
>>     information in the content attribute for some HTTP headers, etc.pp.
>>     I'll find some evil hellcat to put even more evil spells on the HTML
>>     WG members if this attribute won't be kicked out of XHTML 2.0 (or
>>     replaced by something with value) };-)
>
>This is easy to guess. XHTML 2.0 will use the XML 'encoding' pseudo-attribute.

The http-equiv attribute is used for far more things than just the
Content-Type: header, unfortunaly.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 23:08:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:59 GMT