Re: The "iso-8859-8-i" encoding

From: Udi Wertheimer <ticker@newmail.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:40:04 +0200
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c0be85$f1d0e1a0$0200a8c0@Udi>

Oh my.
There is no such thing as "iso-8859-i" I afraid. I'll read my messages twice next time :)
So what I meant was that "iso-8859-8-i" is identical to "iso-8859-8", and so, "iso-8859-8-i" should be treated as an alias for "iso-8859-8".

Received on Friday, 6 April 2001 06:40:01 UTC