Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

On 22.09.99 at 19:26, B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com> wrote:

>>And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_
>>better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too.
>
>Hmm... WDG's validator doesn't seem to have support for XHTML:

Well "better" is both a relative term and a subjective one. :-)

-- 
*** I just switched to a new email client.
*** If you see any format problems in this message, yell. Loudly! :-)

                                             -link

Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 20:18:32 UTC