On 22.09.99 at 19:26, B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com> wrote: >>And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_ >>better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too. > >Hmm... WDG's validator doesn't seem to have support for XHTML: Well "better" is both a relative term and a subjective one. :-) -- *** I just switched to a new email client. *** If you see any format problems in this message, yell. Loudly! :-) -linkReceived on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 20:18:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:52 GMT