- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 12:41:57 -0400
- To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>, Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
At 05:22 PM 9/22/99 +0100, Lloyd Wood wrote: >On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Terje Bless wrote: > >> The issue is what the badge signifies. Compliance with a certain standard >> or the use of a specific bit of software. The presense of the W3C logo on >> the badge is incidental. > >and doesn't signify e.g. payment of W3C membership fees? What? No, we're talking about the HTML 4.0 valid icon. Going back to a prevous message, I find the assertion that the W3C validator is dated, badly in need of an overhaul, and other statements to be quite surprising. Yes, Gerald is busy, but it doesn't make the work faulty, nor necessarily incomplete. Indeed, they've kept up with XHTML 1.0, HTML 4.01, and much more. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 12:45:43 UTC