W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 1999

RE: PNG versions of valid HTML images added

From: B. Szyszka <bart@gigabee.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 15:10:45 -0400
To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Cc: "Gerald Oskoboiny" <gerald@w3.org>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBJGHHILFHFKNMOGJIIELLCLAA.bart@gigabee.com>
> It's not, because XHTML may still change.  It doesn't make sense to issue
> icons for something that's still going through the W3C process; it's not
> within the W3C's style to issue official icons for something that isn't
> official yet.
No less sense than letting people validate their sites with XHTML. All
the icon represents to me is that I did that and that I did it through the
W3C.

> Nothing says you are _guaranteed_ an icon for any particular validation
> process.
I don't believe anyone said they are, although judging by the responses
(excluding yours of course) to the icon that is on my site, people have been
expecting and waiting for that icon to show up. They are creating code that
validates to XHTML1 as it currently is and would like to use a W3C icon to
show that that's what they have done. IMO, it's really that simple and since
there has been no official explanation on what the icons represent, my
assumptions are no less (or more) accurate than yours.

-- 
Bart Szyszka  bart@gigabee.com  ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx  http://www.bgrafyx.com
L.J.R. Engineering  http://www.ljreng.com
PHP Interest Group  http://www.gigabee.com/pig/
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 1999 15:48:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:52 GMT