Paul McKeown (Tiscali) wrote: > I agree that the validator should be concerned only with the relevant > specifications. > > So why the reluctance to correct it in line with the spec for CSS 2.1? As I previously explained, I am not in the least reluctant, and my contribution was intended solely to facilitate the correction, not to oppose it in any way. Philip TAYLORReceived on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:39:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 11:39:36 GMT