W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Floats need explicit width??

From: Paul McKeown (Tiscali) <ppjmckeown@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:37:03 +0100
Message-ID: <BAY116-DAV11F3BCAEB94C8274C0BFF91840@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <49D9E95F.8090300@tiscali.co.uk>
To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
CC: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>, "www-validator-css@w3.org" <www-validator-css@w3.org>
Sorry Philip,

Just that this dragging on with this simple issue is getting my goat. Badly.

Sorry for my overheated response.

Regards,
Paul.

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote:
> Dear Paul --
>
> I apologise if you felt there was any "sharp tone"
> in my message; on my part, there was no such
> intention, and my sole aim was to /help/ you to
> achieve your goal (which I regard as an eminently
> sensible one) rather than to hinder you in any way.
>
> Philip TAYLOR
> --------
> Paul McKeown (Tiscali) wrote:
> > Philip,
> >
> > There was no agreement that the warning was in any way correct in CSS
> > 2.1; the behaviour of the validator simply defies the specification.
> >
> > My observations regarding behaviour of browsers was simply a 
> response to
> > previous bleather by other correspondents - please review the thread.
> >
> > Personally all I care about is the correct behaviour of the validator -
> > and your sharp toned response to my request is unhelpful, in my view.
> >
> > It should be possible, in my opinion, to toggle off an informational
> > message, if any are generated.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
>
Received on Monday, 6 April 2009 11:39:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:14:23 GMT