On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > I guess the CSS Validator somehow changed its processing > of character encodings, then. Yes. The CSS Validator now accepts a UTF-8-encoded BOM even when no charset parameter is specified. However, it still shows the BOM as three replacement characters U+FFFD under "Valid CSS information". http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/bom.css#css Question for the OP: Which brain-dead software spoils an *ASCII* text file by inserting a BOM?Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 15:13:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 March 2009 14:44:29 GMT