On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > The W3C CSS Validator is capable of handling HTML documents as well, > and this is a _very_ useful thing and should not be disturbed. > If there is or was a problem, it was in the handling of HTTP error > responses. I think http://validator.w3.org/ is more helpful than http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ with non-existing pages. Is it possible to make them give the same answers?Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:06:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 March 2009 14:44:29 GMT