Next message: Craig A. Finseth: "Re: tv:"
Message-ID: <38FD578F.D73591C8@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 14:51:59 +0800
From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
To: "Jerding, Dean" <Dean.Jerding@sciatl.com>
CC: uri@w3.org, www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: tv:
Dean,
See
"Uniform Resource Identifiers for Television Broadcasts"
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zigmond-tv-url-04.txt
> "Jerding, Dean" a écrit :
>
> Where is the latest specification for the "tv:" scheme? I'm new to
> this list, so apologize if this is documented elsewhere. What I have
> seen on w3 was just a draft of a proposal with some unfinished areas
> such as tying in to ATSC, DVB, etc SI specifications.
> Scientific-Atlanta is using our own version of a "tv:" like URL scheme
> so we'd like to contribute to the specification and abide by the
> standard.
>
> thanks
> Dean
>
> Dean Jerding, Ph.D.
> Applications Software | Subscriber Networks | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
> Dean.Jerding@sciatl.com | 770 236 3388 | 770 236 2449 (fax)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 12:07 AM
> To: Dan Zigmond
> Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
>
> Dan,
>
> i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
> forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
> was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
> time to wrap this up.
>
> -Philipp
>
> Dan Zigmond a écrit :
> >
> > Agreed. We were a little careless in our terminology (as others
> also
> > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the
> drafts.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Dan Zigmond
> > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
> > WebTV Networks, Inc.
> > djz@corp.webtv.net
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
> > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> > Subject: "lid" URLs
> >
> > (someone) wrote me:
> >
> > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and
> refer to a
> > > URI scheme called lid:
> > >
> > > draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
> > > draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
> > >
> > > I have two thoughts:
> > >
> > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
> > >
> > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and
> URNs, but
> > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:"
> or
> > > namespace identifier parts).
> >
> > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like
> semantics,
> > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think
> the
> > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change,
> since
> > it just adds confusion.
> >
> > Larry