On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote: > There was an objection that site-meta (which is served over http) should > not be authoritative for email: URI schemes, but I think that was voted down > :-) > > I'm sorta new to these lists, but were you meaning to say that site-meta *will* be authoritative for email: URI schemes, or that such an idea was voted down (and thus, site-meta will *not* be authoritative for email: URI schemes)? DavidReceived on Saturday, 6 December 2008 14:52:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:52 GMT