W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > November to December 2008

Re: Fallback flow for /site-meta for top level domains

From: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:59:22 -0800
Message-ID: <60c552b80812051159s669103acid8b698559a0151d8@mail.gmail.com>
To: sappenin@gmail.com
Cc: Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-talk@w3.org" <www-talk@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:28 AM, David Fuelling <sappenin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote:
>> There was an objection that site-meta (which is served over http) should
>> not be authoritative for email: URI schemes, but I think that was voted down
>> :-)
> I'm sorta new to these lists, but were you meaning to say that site-meta
> *will* be authoritative for email: URI schemes, or that such an idea was
> voted down (and thus, site-meta will *not* be authoritative for email: URI
> schemes)?

What I was trying to say was that I heard good arguments on the list on why
site-meta should be used (among other things, of course) to point to
meta-data for email: URIs.


> David
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 20:00:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:33:07 UTC