W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 2001

Re: Signing Document and PICS

From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: <www-talk@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.32.0104061144400.2670-100000@paddington>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Actually, looking at the way the W3C is moving it would probably be best to
> have an RDF statement at the top. RDF used to be called PICS-NG, so they're
> quite similar. Basically, the name value pair would be creator = "Russell
> O'Connor".
>
> Hope this helps,

Thanks, this is a really good idea.  I do have a few questions.  Maybe you
can point me to the right documentation.  I can't just insert the RDF into
the head of the document because it will no longer be valid HTML 4.0.
Also, the RDF data is useless to me without a digital signature.  PICS has
DSIG, where is the analogus thing for RDF?

- --
Russell O'Connor                           roconnor@math.berkeley.edu
           <http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/>
``Paradoxically, a refusal to `put a monetary value on life' means that
life is often undervalued.'' -- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6zg63ZG3em5NXM14RAve5AJwN8nMMCkZ3GkviwDDW90KAbU0xsQCeLXUj
/M3u2gHtsDV/hioaXIeiPZ4=
=frpZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 6 April 2001 14:45:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:25 GMT