W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2012

Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation

From: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:26:46 +0900
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, tore.eriksson@gmail.com
Message-Id: <20120329112645.3DC8.9D98B4E7@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>

I agree, I just have an addendum:

Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 3/28/12 5:48 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > Again, I believe the very opposite. My way of reading the HTML
> > specification focuses completely at the document in the role of
> > representation, not resource.
> Documents are Resources.
> Resources have Representation.
HTML Document resources represent themselves.
> Mime Types can help you understand different types of Resource
> Representation pre or post across-the-wire serialization.
> A Web page is a Document. Its typical Mime Type is: text/html.

Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 02:27:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:14 UTC