- From: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:55:21 +0900
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
> Apologies but I have to disagree completely here, I can say I'm a
> goldfish but I have the properties of a human and belong in the Set of
> Humans, no matter how much I say, I'm never going to be a goldfish -
> there's no design choice there, similarly if something a representation
> of something was retrieved via HTTP, then it belongs to the set of
> things which can have their representations retrieved via HTTP, that
> just is a fact, not a design decision.
If we agree that
_:a a rdfs:Class;
rdfs:comment "the set of things which can have
their representations retrieved via HTTP";
owl:equivalentClass rdfs:Resource.
the interface between the web and the semantic web becomes much easier
to understand.
Tore
_______________________________________________________________
Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 02:56:10 UTC