W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2012

Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:15:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4F744456.1020407@openlinksw.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
On 3/28/12 10:26 PM, トーレ エリクソン wrote:
> Kingsley,
>
> I agree, I just have an addendum:
>
> Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 3/28/12 5:48 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
>>> Again, I believe the very opposite. My way of reading the HTML
>>> specification focuses completely at the document in the role of
>>> representation, not resource.
>> Documents are Resources.
>> Resources have Representation.
> HTML Document resources represent themselves.

Yes they do :-)

>> Mime Types can help you understand different types of Resource
>> Representation pre or post across-the-wire serialization.
>> A Web page is a Document. Its typical Mime Type is: text/html.
> _______________________________________________________________
> Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 11:16:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:50 GMT