Re: URIs, used in RDF, that do not have associated documentation

On 3/28/12 10:26 PM, トーレ　エリクソン wrote:
> Kingsley,
>
> I agree, I just have an addendum:
>
> Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 3/28/12 5:48 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
>>> Again, I believe the very opposite. My way of reading the HTML
>>> specification focuses completely at the document in the role of
>>> representation, not resource.
>> Documents are Resources.
>> Resources have Representation.
> HTML Document resources represent themselves.

Yes they do :-)

>> Mime Types can help you understand different types of Resource
>> Representation pre or post across-the-wire serialization.
>> A Web page is a Document. Its typical Mime Type is: text/html.
> _______________________________________________________________
> Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen