Re: Mime Types and Fragment IDs

Henry,

On 29 Sep 2011, at 09:49, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Although this document by Jeni Tennison [1] was discussed at the
> recent TAG f2f [2] no specific announcement of its publication has
> appeared here, so, here is one.
> 
> And a question:
> 
> In section 1.5 [3], the RDF in SVG example, the id attributes are
> missing from the 'line' elements -- by accident, or by design?

By design, so that #hermione could in that example be unambiguously used to point to a person rather than an element in the document / line in the graphic / bar in the bar chart.

> And the assertions made consist of the following triples, right?
> 
> <http://example.org/potter#hermione> rdfs:type foaf:Person.
> <http://example.org/potter#hermione> foaf:name "Hermione Granger".

rdf:type rather than rdfs:type but otherwise yes.

Jeni

> (TAG ACTION-567)
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/13-minutes#item02
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2011-08-12#semantic-content

-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com