W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Mime Types and Fragment IDs

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:30:44 +0100
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <AF5ECBB9-CA50-4C44-8492-45A0819A9591@jenitennison.com>
To: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Henry,

On 29 Sep 2011, at 09:49, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Although this document by Jeni Tennison [1] was discussed at the
> recent TAG f2f [2] no specific announcement of its publication has
> appeared here, so, here is one.
> 
> And a question:
> 
> In section 1.5 [3], the RDF in SVG example, the id attributes are
> missing from the 'line' elements -- by accident, or by design?

By design, so that #hermione could in that example be unambiguously used to point to a person rather than an element in the document / line in the graphic / bar in the bar chart.

> And the assertions made consist of the following triples, right?
> 
> <http://example.org/potter#hermione> rdfs:type foaf:Person.
> <http://example.org/potter#hermione> foaf:name "Hermione Granger".

rdf:type rather than rdfs:type but otherwise yes.

Jeni

> (TAG ACTION-567)
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/09/13-minutes#item02
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2011-08-12#semantic-content

-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 18:31:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:39 GMT