On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: > There's the abstract question of what "Normative" might mean in the general case, and I think the W3C QA documents might address that. > > However, specifically, the TAG has asked the HTML working group to produce a normative HTML language reference, and it seems like it would be helpful to be more precise about what WE meant, and why we asked for such a thing. > > So maybe we could focus on that: when we said we wanted a normative language specification for HTML, what meaning of "normative" did we mean? > > Larry Agreed. All, please ignore my highly random and distracting earlier reply. JonathanReceived on Monday, 13 June 2011 01:26:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT