There's the abstract question of what "Normative" might mean in the general case, and I think the W3C QA documents might address that. However, specifically, the TAG has asked the HTML working group to produce a normative HTML language reference, and it seems like it would be helpful to be more precise about what WE meant, and why we asked for such a thing. So maybe we could focus on that: when we said we wanted a normative language specification for HTML, what meaning of "normative" did we mean? LarryReceived on Sunday, 12 June 2011 21:31:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT