- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:02:21 +0000
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Links for persistence session (obviously not required reading) - geo: URI scheme http://geouri.org/about/ http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870 - ORCID http://www.orcid.org/ - Datacite http://www.datacite.org/whatdowedo - DOI Foundation http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/governance.html - duri: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-08 - WebCite http://webcitation.org/ - P2P DNS http://p2pdns.baywords.com/2010/11/30/hello-world/#comments - Namecoin https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/master/FAQ.md - W3C URI persistence policy http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence.html - Vocabulary Hosting: A Modest Proposal http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/papers Discussion topics for session - Goal: links that are both actionable and "persistent" (trustworthy) - Use cases: (1) permanent record (text), (2) archival linked data - TAG can't take initiative but can inform and advise - The issue is trust, not technique. DOIs are trusted by the affected communities. - How vulnerable are DOIs? - How vulnerable are W3C URIs? Thought experiment: Should W3C buy some DOIs? - What sort of miracle might bring about actionable trusted-to-be-persistent URIs? Is this a thought experiment or real prospect? Jonathan
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 14:02:49 UTC