W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2011

Links and notes for the ISSUE-50 session

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:02:21 +0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9iTfbmOYDPw6zs0J1ZdqzoziE3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Links for persistence session (obviously not required reading)

- geo: URI scheme
    http://geouri.org/about/
    http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870
- ORCID
    http://www.orcid.org/
- Datacite
    http://www.datacite.org/whatdowedo
- DOI Foundation
    http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/governance.html
- duri:
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-08
- WebCite
    http://webcitation.org/
- P2P DNS
    http://p2pdns.baywords.com/2010/11/30/hello-world/#comments
- Namecoin
    https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/master/FAQ.md
- W3C URI persistence policy
    http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence.html
- Vocabulary Hosting: A Modest Proposal
    http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/papers

Discussion topics for session

- Goal: links that are both actionable and "persistent" (trustworthy)
- Use cases: (1) permanent record (text), (2) archival linked data
- TAG can't take initiative but can inform and advise
- The issue is trust, not technique.  DOIs are trusted by the affected
    communities.
- How vulnerable are DOIs?
- How vulnerable are W3C URIs?  Thought experiment: Should W3C buy
    some DOIs?
- What sort of miracle might bring about actionable
  trusted-to-be-persistent URIs?  Is this a thought experiment or real prospect?

Jonathan
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 14:02:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT